Case 3310054/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Amy Stewart v MCE Insurance Ltd (In Creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2025

Case reference: 3310054/2023
Decision date: 29 September 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Graham

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Amy Stewart

Respondent

MCE Insurance Ltd (In Creditors voluntary liquidation)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Amy Stewart's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal succeeded. The tribunal ordered a Basic Award of £7,716 and a Compensatory Award of £500 for loss of statutory rights.

The tribunal also found that the respondent had breached the duty to provide a statement of particulars under s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996. Under s.38 Employment Act 2002, it awarded £2,805.40, which the judgment records as the equivalent of four weeks' pay.

In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consultation) Act 1992 and made a Protective Award of £9,017.10. The complaint for notice pay was dismissed upon withdrawal.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	The complaint of constructive unfair dismissal succeeded. The tribunal awarded a Basic Award of £7,716 and a Compensatory Award of £500 for loss of statutory rights.	Upheld	—	£8,216
Other	The tribunal found a breach of the duty to provide a statement of particulars under s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996 and, under s.38 Employment Act 2002, awarded £2,805.40, described as the equivalent of four weeks' pay.	Upheld	—	£2,805
Other	The tribunal found non-compliance with s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consultation) Act 1992 and made a Protective Award of £9,017.10.	Upheld	—	£9,017
Breach of contract	The complaint for notice pay was dismissed upon withdrawal.	Withdrawn	—	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £20,039; across all upheld claims
Basic award: £7,716; statutory, unfair dismissal
Compensatory award: £500; compensatory remedy recorded

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.