Case 3310059/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Verdillo v Cambridge Burger Trading Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3310059/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Verdillo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore made a determination on the papers.
The tribunal declared that there had been unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered Cambridge Burger Trading Ltd to pay £400 gross. It also ordered the respondent to pay £1,792 gross in respect of the claimant's accrued unpaid holidays.
The judgment stated that the claimant was to account for any income tax and national insurance due on those sums. No other claims, findings, or remedy components were set out in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Declared that there had been unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £400 gross. | Upheld | — | £400 |
| Holiday pay | Ordered payment of £1,792 gross in respect of accrued unpaid holidays. | Upheld | — | £1,792 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,192
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.