Case 3310075/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Manuel Marta v LTS Facilities Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3310075/2022
- Decision date
- 26 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Manuel Marta
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard from Ms L Sunda, Managing Director, and recorded that the correct respondent was LTS Facilities Ltd because LTS Cleaning Ltd had transferred the claimant’s employment to LTS Facilities Ltd before going into liquidation on or around 9 May 2022. The judgment was given orally at the hearing and the written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal declared that there had been unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,802.67 gross. It also ordered payment of £470.25 gross for 11 days’ accrued untaken holiday. The total sum payable was recorded as £2,272.92 gross, and the claimant was directed to account for any deductions for income tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that there had been unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,802.67 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,803 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £470.25 gross for 11 days accrued untaken holidays. | Upheld | — | £470 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,273
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.