Case 3310076/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Ravdivja v Complex Logistics Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3310076/2022
- Decision date
- 25 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Margo Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Ravdivja
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a virtual hearing on 9 March 2023 before Employment Judge Margo, the respondent agreed that it had underpaid the claimant, Mr D Ravdivja, by £851.25 in respect of unpaid wages, described in the judgment as 10 days' pay. It also agreed that it had underpaid him £510.75 in respect of accrued and untaken holiday pay, described as 6 days' pay.
The judgment records that, by consent, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a total of £1,362.00 net. No further findings on liability, legal test, or contested issues are recorded in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent agreed it had underpaid the claimant by this amount in respect of unpaid wages (10 days' pay), and payment was ordered by consent. | Settled | — | £851 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent agreed it had underpaid the claimant by this amount in respect of accrued and untaken holiday pay (6 days' pay), and payment was ordered by consent. | Settled | — | £511 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,362
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.