Case 3310088/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Brown v Sew on and sew forth Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3310088/2022
- Decision date
- 23 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Watford Employment Tribunals on 04 August 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Mr S Brown was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, it held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment.
The judgment records the amount of the redundancy payment as £1,930.50. No other claim, remedy component, or separate award calculation is set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal determined the claim under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. It found the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,930.50. | Upheld | — | £1,931 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,931
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.