Case 3310103/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Smith v Carisway Facilities Support Limited (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3310103/2021
- Decision date
- 1 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Reading on 15, 16 and 17 August 2022, before Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto, the tribunal found that Mrs J Smith was dismissed by Carisway Facilities Support Limited and that she was unfairly dismissed. The written record contains the liability finding only and does not set out the tribunal's reasons, because the judgment was given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal adjourned the question of remedy to 28 October 2022. It directed the claimant to send any further submissions on remedy by 14 September 2022, together with a brief medical statement if available on when she is likely to be fit for work, and directed the respondent to file any further remedy submissions by 28 September 2022. No compensation figure is recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Remedy was adjourned; no monetary award was determined in this decision. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.