Case 3310166/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Egbivwie v NHS England R1 Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust R2 — 2023
- Case reference
- 3310166/2022
- Decision date
- 16 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Egbivwie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a strike-out judgment under rule 37. It recorded that by letter dated 13 July 2023 the claimant was given an opportunity to contact the tribunal by 27 July 2023 to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not ask for a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment claim, any liability finding, or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive underlying claim in the extracted text. It records a rule 37 strike-out because the claim had not been actively pursued, after the claimant was given an opportunity by letter dated 13 July 2023 to make representations or request a hearing by 27 July 2023 and did not do so. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.