Case 3310197/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Howland v Gardarica Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3310197/2021
- Decision date
- 18 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Howland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was entered under Rule 21. The tribunal found that Gardarica Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs C Howland's wages and ordered the respondent to pay £3,137.74. The judgment states that this is a gross sum, to be satisfied by payment of the net amount to the claimant with the respondent accounting to HMRC for any tax or national insurance due on the payment.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay £37.00 as compensation for breach of contract. No further reasoning, hearing findings, or separate remedy components are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £3,137.74 gross. | Upheld | — | £3,138 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered £37.00 compensation for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £37 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,175
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.