Case 3310241/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Rozycki, Counsel For the v Mr Bhebhe, Consultant — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310241/2023
- Decision date
- 19 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Rozycki, Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Tynan, sitting alone at Cambridge on 11 April 2024, found that the complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages, breach of contract in relation to notice pay, and unfair dismissal were all well founded. The Respondent was ordered to pay GBP 2,403.80 as the gross sum unlawfully deducted between July 2022 and 14 June 2023, and GBP 1,689.11 net as damages for breach of contract in respect of notice pay.
On the unfair dismissal claim, the Tribunal found that there was no chance the Claimant would have been fairly dismissed by the Respondent in any event. A basic award of GBP 1,320 and a compensatory award of GBP 500 were made.
The Tribunal further found that the Respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures, and that it was just and equitable to increase the awards payable in respect of wages and notice pay by 15% under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, yielding a further sum of GBP 613.94. The total award was GBP 6,526.85.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross sum deducted in the period July 2022 to 14 June 2023; Claimant responsible for tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £2,403 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for breach of contract in relation to notice pay (net). | Upheld | — | £1,689 |
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award of GBP 1,320 and compensatory award of GBP 500. Tribunal found there was no chance the Claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event. | Upheld | — | £1,820 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,526
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,320
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.