Case 3310247/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Whelan v Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310247/2022
- Decision date
- 27 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Whelan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 February 2024, the tribunal gave Mr Whelan an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's order of 10 November 2023. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On 27 March 2024 Employment Judge Anstis struck out the claim. The written reasons are limited to that procedural issue and do not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying complaints. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The reasons do not separate the underlying complaints; the tribunal struck out the claim as a whole after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the 28 February 2024 letter about non-compliance with the tribunal's order of 10 November 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The reasons do not separate the underlying complaints; the tribunal struck out the claim as a whole after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the 28 February 2024 letter about non-compliance with the tribunal's order of 10 November 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.