Case 3310387/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms. M. Munroe – Lay Representative — 2025
- Case reference
- 3310387/2023
- Decision date
- 10 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grahame Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim under s.188 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the respondent failed to make a payment under s.182. The judgment states that the claim was presented out of time and that it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time.
On the claimant's reference under s.170(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal determined that the respondent was liable to pay the employer's payment. The sum payable was determined to be £6,461.56.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment describes this as a claim under s.188 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the respondent failed to make a payment under s.182. It was dismissed as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | On the claimant's reference under s.170(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal determined that the respondent was liable to pay the employer's payment. | Upheld | — | £6,462 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,462
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.