Case 3310426/2023 · Employment Tribunal
each in person For the v Ms Y. Barlay (representative) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310426/2023
- Decision date
- 6 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hunt Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
each in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford by CVP on 23 May 2024, Employment Judge Hunt heard the matter with the Claimants appearing in person and Ms Y. Barlay appearing for the Respondent. The written record identifies the case numbers 3310426/2023, 3310427/2023, 3310715/2023 and 3310716/2023.
The only decision recorded is that the Claimants' application for strike out of the Respondent's response to each claim was dismissed. No substantive merits findings are recorded in the written judgment.
The record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless a written request is made within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The Claimants' application for strike out of the Respondent's response to each claim was dismissed. The written record does not determine the underlying substantive claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.