Case 3310428/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms J Collazo, HR Director — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310428/2023
- Decision date
- 30 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mrs K Sunavska was dismissed unfairly by All Square Limited, trading as Cleanology. It awarded a basic award of two weeks' pay in the sum of £980.77.
The tribunal recorded that no compensatory award under section 123 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was payable for the unfair dismissal. It also recorded that the claimant was not dismissed wrongfully. Reasons were given orally, and the written record does not set out further factual findings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that the claimant was dismissed unfairly and awarded a basic award only. | Upheld | — | £981 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The written judgment states that the claimant was not dismissed wrongfully. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £981
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £981
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 123 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 119 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.