Case 3310430/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Mitchell v Camphill Village Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310430/2023
- Decision date
- 18 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicklin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Mitchell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case on 26 March 2024 at Watford via CVP before Employment Judge Nicklin. The claimant, Miss K Mitchell, did not attend but was represented by her mother, Ms A Mitchell, by telephone with the claimant's written consent. The respondent was represented by Ms M Hoeritzauer, Solicitor.
In the written judgment, the tribunal held that the discrimination claims had been presented out of time. It found that it was not just and equitable to extend time. On that basis, the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the discrimination claims.
All claims were therefore dismissed. The written record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment refers only to 'claims of discrimination' and does not specify the individual heads of claim in the text supplied; classification as disability discrimination follows the case listing context. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.