Case 3310503/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mr P R Callender v British Gas Services Limited — 2022

Case reference: 3310503/2019
Decision date: 21 January 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Maxwell
Panel members: Ms Elizabeth, Mrs Binks

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr P R Callender

Respondent

British Gas Services Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment records that the claimant's holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal. His direct discrimination claim and reasonable adjustments claim were found not well-founded and dismissed.

The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well-founded and it succeeded. It also found the claimant's discrimination arising claim, with respect to dismissal, well-founded and that claim succeeded.

The judgment provided is a short liability judgment and does not set out remedy figures or detailed reasons for the findings.

Claims and outcomes

5 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Holiday pay	The judgment states the holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal.	Withdrawn	—	—
Disability discrimination	Direct discrimination claim; the judgment does not restate the protected characteristic in the operative text, but the case listing identifies disability discrimination and the other discrimination complaints are disability-specific.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Reasonable adjustments claim; not well-founded and dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Unfair dismissal	The unfair dismissal claim was found well-founded and succeeded.	Upheld	—	—
Disability discrimination	Discrimination arising claim with respect to dismissal; well-founded and succeeded.	Upheld	Disability	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.