Case 3310506/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310506/2023
- Decision date
- 26 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Members
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Ms L Farrell, Mr R Spry-Shute
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Reading on 23, 24 and 25 September 2024 before Employment Judge George, with Ms L Farrell and Mr R Spry-Shute as members. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The written record states that the complaints of race discrimination were not well founded and were dismissed. It also states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. The extracted record does not include the tribunal's oral reasons or any separate written reasons.
The decision note records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.