Case 3310518/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Miss A Botu, HR Manager — 2019
- Case reference
- 3310518/2019
- Decision date
- 5 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short consent judgment. The tribunal recorded that, by agreement, Biomarsh Environmental Limited would pay Mr E Karkls £1,454.32 in settlement of all claims brought by him. The extracted text does not set out the underlying causes of action or make any findings on liability.
The judgment records the payment terms only. The sum was to be paid by four equal instalments of £363.58 on the fifth day of each month, starting on 5 August 2019. No separate award breakdown, legal test, or merits reasoning is given in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | By consent, the respondent agreed to pay £1,454.32 in settlement of all claims brought by the claimant, payable in four equal instalments of £363.58. The extracted text does not identify the underlying pleaded claims. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,454
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.