Case 3310521/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N MacNab-Grieve v RFT Repairs Limited & RFT Repairs & Maintenance Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3310521/2019
- Decision date
- 16 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N MacNab-Grieve
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr N MacNab-Grieve's claim for unpaid wages at Bury St Edmunds on 16 August 2019 before Employment Judge M Warren. The respondent was RFT Repairs Limited & RFT Repairs & Maintenance Limited, represented by counsel.
The written judgment records that the claimant's claim for unpaid wages failed and was dismissed. No written findings of fact or legal reasoning are set out in the extracted decision.
The judgment also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record states that the claimant's claim for unpaid wages fails and is dismissed. No written reasons are included because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.