Case 3310526/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Whitehouse v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310526/2023
- Decision date
- 9 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Whitehouse
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. By letter dated 11 June 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim without addressing the merits of the underlying complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The disability discrimination classification comes from the gov.uk listing category, as the judgment text itself does not set out the pleaded claim types. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The unlawful deduction from wages classification comes from the gov.uk listing category, as the judgment text itself does not set out the pleaded claim types. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.