Case 3310531/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Ronik Dixon Young v Haybrook College Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310531/2023
- Decision date
- 13 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Manley
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Mrs D Ballard, Mrs C Tufts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Ronik Dixon Young
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Reading on 13 November 2024 before Employment Judge Manley, Mrs D Ballard and Mrs C Tufts. The claimant, Miss Ronik Dixon Young, did not attend. The respondent, Haybrook College Trust, was represented by Mr Rockman, executive headteacher.
The tribunal amended the name of the respondent to Haybrook College Trust. It then dismissed the claim because the claimant was not in attendance, citing rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The extracted judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying employment issues, and it does not set out any monetary remedy or award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the extracted text. The claim was dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant was not in attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.