Case 3310574/2023 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Julia Fuller (2) Darren Fuller v Shepperton Signs Limited – In Liquidation and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3310574/2023
- Decision date
- 3 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Islam Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds via CVP
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Julia Fuller (2) Darren Fuller
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claims in accordance with Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 after the claimants did not attend the hearing on 15 May 2024.
The tribunal recorded that the Notice of Hearing had been sent to the claimants on 14 February 2024 and that there was no correspondence explaining non-attendance. The tribunal made phone and email enquiries, checked its inbox, and noted that the claimants had not joined late or responded to contact.
The second respondent's representative told the tribunal that there had been no engagement from the claimants since the January 2024 case management hearing, apart from one email from Mrs Fuller on 17 January 2024. The claimants had not participated in preparing the bundle and had not provided witness statements, submissions, or other documents showing engagement with the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the claims under Rule 47 following the claimants' non-attendance. The judgment itself does not set out the substantive particulars of this claim; classification follows the listed case category. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment dismisses the claims under Rule 47 following the claimants' non-attendance. The judgment itself does not set out the substantive particulars of this claim; classification follows the listed redundancy category. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The listed category includes rights on insolvency, but the judgment does not identify the specific statutory claim. Classified as other with reduced confidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of The Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.