Case 3310602/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C J Gubby v Trinity Care Group Beds and Northants Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310602/2023
- Decision date
- 16 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Scott Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C J Gubby
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Gubby commenced work on 19 May 2023 and the tribunal found that Trinity Care Beds and Northants Ltd, not Visiting Angels, was her employer up to 24 July 2023. The judge relied on the service agreement, payslips and the respondent's own July 2023 correspondence saying she had been employed by Trinity Care Beds and Northants Ltd. The franchise agreement and the late-produced material did not displace that finding, and the evidence was insufficient to show any relevant TUPE transfer.
It was common ground that the claimant had not been paid for 1 July 2023 to 24 July 2023, and the parties agreed the unpaid salary was £1,749.99 gross. The respondent accepted there was no statutory basis for the deduction and did not rely on any written consent. Its case was that it could recover losses for alleged damage to a laptop and asserted repair costs of £800, but it produced no supporting evidence such as a receipt. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that she returned the laptop in the condition in which it had been provided and found no lawful basis for the deduction.
The tribunal therefore upheld the unlawful deductions from wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay £1,749.99 gross. The separate mileage or travel costs claim failed because the tribunal found no contractual or other entitlement to mileage, whether written or oral, and rejected the claim for £250. The judge also referred to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, Delaney v Staples, and regulation 4 of the TUPE Regulations 2006 in the reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid salary for 1 July 2023 to 24 July 2023; tribunal found the respondent was the claimant's employer and had no lawful basis to withhold payment. | Upheld | — | £1,750 |
| Other | Claim for mileage or travel costs. The tribunal found there was no evidence of any written or verbal entitlement to mileage and rejected the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,750
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- Delaney v Staples (t/a De Montfort Recruitment) 1991 ICR 331 CA
- TUPE Regulations 2006 reg. 4
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.