Case 3310606/2020 · Employment Tribunal
P Sathiyanathan v Uber London Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310606/2020
- Decision date
- 29 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
P Sathiyanathan
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 22 April 2024 to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment text does not identify the underlying cause of action. Although the gov.uk listing category indicates Working Time Regulations, that is not stated in the judgment itself, so the claim type is recorded as 'other'. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.