Case 3310628/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Club One (Ascot) Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310628/2023
- Decision date
- 3 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Reading Employment Tribunal on 25 September 2024 before Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby. The claimant, Mr Jose Gomes, appeared in person and there was no attendance by the respondent, Club One (Ascot) Limited.
The tribunal found that the claimant's claim for redundancy pay was well founded and awarded the gross sum of £6,300. The tribunal also found that the claimant's claim for holiday pay was well founded and awarded the gross sum of £1,100, noting this may be liable to taxation and National Insurance.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not provided as part of this judgment, absent a request within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claim well founded and awarded the gross sum of £6,300. | Upheld | — | £6,300 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the claim well founded and awarded the gross sum of £1,100, which may be liable to taxation and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,400
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.