Case 3310629/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Nakayenga v Easter and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310629/2023
- Decision date
- 20 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham
Parties
3 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Miss G Nakayenga's claim against Easter and Mary J. By letter dated 23 September 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued after she failed to reply to Tribunal correspondence dated 9 July 2024 and 3 September 2024.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Graham struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the merits and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify a substantive determination of the underlying claim. The claim was struck out because the claimant did not respond to Tribunal correspondence dated 9 July 2024 and 3 September 2024, and did not make sufficient representations after the Tribunal's letter dated 23 September 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.