Case 3310654/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented For the v Network Rail Infrastructure Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310654/2023
- Decision date
- 25 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Cambridge on 25 July 2024, Employment Judge Tynan heard the case. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The respondent was represented by Mr O Holloway, Counsel. The judgment records that, by agreement of the respondent, the claimant's breach of contract claim succeeded in part.
The tribunal awarded £6,290.33 gross for the balance of the claimant's notice period and £188.71 in respect of the employer pension contribution. The £6,290.33 element was subject to PAYE deductions. The written record also states that any further claims pursued as part of the case were dismissed, without identifying those claims separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Succeeded in part. The tribunal awarded £6,290.33 gross for the balance of the notice period and £188.71 for the employer pension contribution; the £6,290.33 was subject to PAYE deductions. | Upheld | — | £6,479 |
| Other | Any further claims pursued by the claimant as part of the case were dismissed, but the judgment does not identify them separately. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,479
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.