Case 3310676/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Banerjee, Solicitor For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3310676/2021
- Decision date
- 30 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mrs A Banerjee, Solicitor For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Cambridge on 3 May 2022 before Employment Judge Tynan, the tribunal considered the claimant's claim that he had been dismissed by the respondent in breach of contract. The tribunal held that the claim had no reasonable prospects of success and struck it out.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. It also records that written reasons would not be provided unless a request was made within 14 days of the sending of the decision. No monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the claim that the claimant was dismissed by Nestlé Purina UK Manufacturing Operations Limited in breach of contract had no reasonable prospects of success and was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospects of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.