Case 3310680/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Unrepresented. For the v Mr C Briggs, Director. — 2022
- Case reference
- 3310680/2021
- Decision date
- 3 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cassel
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Unrepresented. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cambridge on 3 May 2022 before Employment Judge Cassel by CVP. The claimant, Mr D Kostakakis, was unrepresented and the respondent was represented by its director, Mr C Briggs.
The judgment records that the claimant's claims for unfair dismissal, redundancy payment, unpaid holiday pay, and breach of contract in respect of notice pay were dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or statutory tests are set out in the text provided.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 18 May 2022. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states this claim was 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states this claim was 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states this claim was 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | This was the claim for notice pay; the judgment states it was 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.