Case 3310682/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Vickers v The Burger Trading Group UK — 2023
- Case reference
- 3310682/2022
- Decision date
- 23 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Palmer Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Vickers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore decided that a determination could properly be made on the basis of the material before the tribunal, and Burger Trading Group Limited was added as respondent in substitution for Burger Trading Group.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's wages claim and declared that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages in relation to unpaid wages from July 2022. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,517.37.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's holiday pay claim, finding that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of the gross sum of £924.00. The judgment records no separate award for basic compensation, injury to feelings, or interest, and the total monetary outcome is £3,441.37.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in relation to unpaid wages from July 2022. | Upheld | — | £2,517 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £924 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,441
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- rule 34
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.