Case 3310693/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Easter-Bauly v T Jegajeevan — 2023
- Case reference
- 3310693/2022
- Decision date
- 2 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Easter-Bauly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy case management orders dated 31 January 2024, the tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the response should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the respondent had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 2 November 2023 and that the response had not been actively pursued.
The respondent did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient written representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Tynan struck out the response. The judgment also records that the respondent remains entitled to notice of future hearings and decisions, but may only participate to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The respondent's response was struck out after the tribunal found non-compliance with the order dated 2 November 2023 and no sufficient written representations or request for a hearing following the case management orders of 31 January 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.