Case 3310698/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. D. Rose v DAB Civil Engineering Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3310698/2023
- Decision date
- 11 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S. Matthews
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr. D. Sutton, Mr. D. Bean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. D. Rose
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Watford on 2, 3 and 4 December 2024, gave a unanimous judgment in Mr D. Rose’s case against DAB Civil Engineering Limited. The decision records that the complaint of direct disability discrimination was not well founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed, as not well founded, the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, and the complaint of victimisation. These claims therefore failed on their merits.
Two further disability discrimination complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal: indirect disability discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal’s standard note.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation complaint was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The indirect disability discrimination complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.