Case 3310704/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T McManus v British Airways plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310704/2022
- Decision date
- 4 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Ms A Crosby, Ms H T Edwards
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T McManus
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs T McManus brought claims against British Airways plc. The case was heard at Reading on 23-27 September 2024 before Employment Judge Anstis, sitting with Ms A Crosby and Ms H T Edwards. The written judgment record states that the claimant's claims were dismissed.
The record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the written judgment provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record does not set out separate reasons or a claim-by-claim breakdown; it records only that the claimant's claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record does not set out separate reasons or a claim-by-claim breakdown; it records only that the claimant's claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.