Case 3310725/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Strafford v Syneous Health Commercial Europe Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3310725/2021
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Strafford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 7 September 2022 before Employment Judge Laidler at Bury St Edmunds by CVP, the tribunal decided that it had jurisdiction to determine the claimant's complaints. The recorded basis for that decision was that it was just and equitable to extend time.
The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of the complaints or any remedy. It records that the full merits hearing remained listed for 6 to 10 March 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to determine the complaints because it was just and equitable to extend time. The merits hearing remained listed and the substantive complaints were not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.