Case 3310727/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Anderson (Counsel) For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310727/2022
- Decision date
- 29 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms K Anderson (Counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis hearing was listed to determine a preliminary issue in a wider case that included whistleblowing detriment, direct race discrimination, indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment and victimisation. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant, her husband, son and sister-in-law, together with medical records, therapy assessments and submissions from both counsel.
The tribunal found that the claimant had a mental impairment, namely anxiety and depression, from 4 December 2019 onwards. It accepted the medical evidence showing severe anxiety and depression, repeated treatment and medication from that date, and rejected the respondent's submission that there was no sufficient diagnosis or that the condition was entirely a reaction to suspension. The tribunal also accepted that the claimant's condition was not merely a short-term reaction to workplace events.
On adverse effect, the tribunal found that the impairment affected sleeping, getting out of bed, personal care and hygiene, dressing, eating, household chores, shopping and socialising. It accepted the claimant's evidence and the supporting evidence of her family and medical practitioners, and held that these effects were more than minor or trivial. It also found that the impairment was likely to continue for more than 12 months, taking the relevant period from the first alleged discriminatory act and disregarding any improvement due to medication.
The tribunal therefore held that the claimant was disabled for the purposes of section 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of anxiety and depression. The judgment did not determine liability on the underlying discrimination or whistleblowing claims, and it did not record any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal found that the claimant was disabled within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of anxiety and depression from 4 December 2019 to the date of the judgment. Paragraph 41 refers to 4 December 2021, which appears inconsistent with paragraph 37 and the medical evidence and is treated here as a typographical error. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v Patent Office
- Sullivan v Bury Street Capital Limited
- McNicol v Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance Ltd
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Council
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2 Equality Act 2010
- SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle
- McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College
- Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.