Case 3310747/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr JB Ricaurte Coloma v Kyldn Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3310747/2024
- Decision date
- 8 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr JB Ricaurte Coloma
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Mr JB Ricaurte Coloma's claims against Kyldn Limited under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because they had no reasonable prospect of success. The claims comprised unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages and working time claims, and each was struck out.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing on 8 June 2026. The written judgment contains no further claim-specific findings or reasoning and records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment disposes of the claims collectively and does not provide claim-specific reasons. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment disposes of the claims collectively and does not provide claim-specific reasons. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment disposes of the claims collectively and does not provide claim-specific reasons. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a): no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.