Case 3310763/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Anas v BP Exploration Operating Company Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310763/2024
- Decision date
- 8 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Anas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Alliott dealt with the Claimant’s email of 2 January 2025 as an application under Regulation 10A(2) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, seeking fresh consideration of the judgment that had dismissed the claim upon withdrawal. The underlying judgment had been issued by a legal officer.
The tribunal recorded that on 8 November 2024 the Claimant emailed the tribunal and unequivocally withdrew his claim. The judge held that, once withdrawn, the claim came to an end under Rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (described in the reasons as new Rule 50), and a judgment had to be issued under Rule 52 (new Rule 51).
The tribunal said the exceptions did not apply and that there was no discretion to reinstate the claim. It therefore concluded that the earlier decision to dismiss the claim was correct and the dismissal judgment stood.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action. It records that the claim was withdrawn by the Claimant on 8 November 2024 and was then dismissed under Rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.