Case 3310784/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Shiavi v Cedar Park Schools Ltd (In Administration), and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310784/2024
- Decision date
- 28 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms L Shiavi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Southeast Employment Tribunal on 28 September 2024. The first respondent, Cedar Park Schools Ltd (In Administration), failed to present a valid response in time, and the Regional Employment Judge determined that the claim could properly be decided under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the first respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered the first respondent to pay the claimant £205.92. The judgment records that £205.92 is the total sum payable.
The judgment is a short rule 22 determination approved by Regional Employment Judge Foxwell and sent to the parties on 5 February 2026. It does not address any claim against the Secretary of State for Business & Trade on its face, nor does it set out separate remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 22 judgment: first respondent failed to present a valid response in time. Tribunal found unpaid holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £205.92. | Upheld | — | £206 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £206
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.