Mr H Bradley v Vclean Life Ltd — 2026

Case reference: 3310825/2019
Decision date: 26 April 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Henry

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr H Bradley

Respondent

Vclean Life Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 Employment Tribunal judgment in which the respondent, Vclean Life Ltd, had failed to enter a response. Employment Judge Henry recorded that, pursuant to Rule 21, the claim succeeded. The judgment text itself does not identify the individual causes of action, but the case listing context describes the matter as involving Public Interest Disclosure and Unfair Dismissal.

The judgment did not determine remedy. Instead, it stated that the issue of remedy would be decided at a further hearing, and that notice of that hearing would be sent to the parties. No monetary award was set out in the judgment text.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	The PDF judgment is a Rule 21 default judgment and does not identify the pleaded causes of action in the text. Claim type inferred from the case listing context, which refers to Public Interest Disclosure.	Upheld	—	—
Unfair dismissal	The PDF judgment is a Rule 21 default judgment and does not identify the pleaded causes of action in the text. Claim type inferred from the case listing context, which refers to Unfair Dismissal.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.