Case 3310840/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3310840/2019
- Decision date
- 20 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment made under rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The only claim addressed in the judgment was the claimant's breach of contract claim for notice pay.
The tribunal recorded that the claim was dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability, and it does not contain any monetary award.
The hearing was at Reading before Employment Judge Vowles sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms L Quigley, counsel.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract claim for notice pay was dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.