Case 3310849/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Scott-Emuakpor v HCL Social Care Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 3310849/2022
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Scott-Emuakpor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal issued judgment under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge stated that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that the claim succeeds. No substantive factual findings about the underlying deduction issue are included in the extracted text, and no remedy figure is set out in the judgment itself.
The tribunal directed that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a Remedy Hearing. The extracted judgment therefore resolves liability in the claimant's favour but leaves quantum outstanding.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not specify the underlying factual basis of the wages claim in the extracted text. It records only that the claim succeeded and that remedy would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.