Case 3310875/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J. Pusey v The Felixstowe Dock and Railway Company — 2021
- Case reference
- 3310875/2020
- Decision date
- 29 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J. Pusey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined two preliminary issues. It held that the unfair dismissal claim was presented within the statutory time limit because the claimant did not learn of the termination until he received the letter by email on 14 May 2020, and ACAS notification on 7 August 2020 was therefore within time.
On employment status, the tribunal accepted that many features of the relationship pointed towards employee status, including personal performance, integration into the workforce, use of company systems and facilities, and a significant degree of control while working. The claimant had worked regularly for the respondent for several years and in practice was treated in many respects like port operatives.
However, the tribunal concluded that the arrangement lacked the mutuality of obligation necessary for a contract of employment. The claimant was free to choose when to make himself available, including taking lengthy periods away from work without notice requirements, and the respondent was not obliged to offer him work. The fact that work was usually offered when he was available reflected business need rather than contractual obligation. The unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed because the claimant was not an employee within the meaning of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was presented in time, but dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant was not an employee within s.230(1) ERA 1996 due to lack of mutuality of obligation. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.111(2)(a) ERA 1996
- s.230(1) ERA 1996
- s.230(2) ERA 1996
- mutuality of obligation
- global or umbrella contract
- Uber BV v Aslam
- Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher
- Carmichael v National Power plc
- Nethermere St Neots Ltd v Gardiner
- Hellyer Brothers Ltd v McLeod
- Boston Deep Sea Fisheries Ltd v Wilson
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.