Case 3310882/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Reynolds v And West Heath Garage (Farnborough) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3310882/2019
- Decision date
- 1 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Reynolds
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal made a judgment under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. It recorded that the claimant, Mr M Reynolds, had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 22 March 2019 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
On 4 September 2019 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant saying an Employment Judge was considering striking out the claim. He was given until 18 September 2019 to object or to request a hearing on the issue, but he failed to respond. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim for unfair dismissal.
The listed hearing on 16 January 2020 was cancelled. No monetary remedy was awarded or assessed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim under rule 37 after the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 22 March 2019 and had not actively pursued the claim. A letter dated 4 September 2019 invited objection or a request for a hearing by 18 September 2019, but no response was received. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.