Case 3310887/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Agunbiade, Trade Union Representative For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310887/2023
- Decision date
- 16 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr W Agunbiade, Trade Union Representative For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case in Cambridge by CVP on 4, 5 and 6 September 2024 before Employment Judge Tynan. The claimant was Mr Mohamed Banka, and the respondent was MTR Corporation (Crossrail) Limited trading as MTR Elizabeth Line.
The sole claim identified in the written judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal stated that the claimant’s claim that he was unfairly dismissed was not well founded and was dismissed.
The written record also notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. It further states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons are provided in the extract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.