Mr C Wilson v Netdata Ltd — 2020

Case reference: 3310893/2019
Decision date: 4 February 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Vowles

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr C Wilson

Respondent

Netdata Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Netdata Limited did not present a response to the claim, so the tribunal entered judgment in favour of Mr C Wilson under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment records that the claimant succeeded on the claims described as unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.

The tribunal awarded £2,692.32 for unpaid wages and £942.34 for unpaid holiday pay. The total award was £3,634.66, which the respondent was ordered to pay to the claimant. No further reasoning, legal test, or separate remedy breakdown is given in the judgment, and the hearing listed for 4 February 2020 was cancelled.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The judgment labels this head of claim as unpaid wages and enters judgment under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response.	Upheld	—	£2,692
Holiday pay	The judgment labels this head of claim as unpaid holiday pay and enters judgment under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response.	Upheld	—	£942

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £3,635; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.