Case 3310894/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Ottey v New horizons — 2025
- Case reference
- 3310894/2023
- Decision date
- 29 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Ottey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 2 January 2025, the tribunal gave Mr R Ottey an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 31 July 2024 and that the case had not been actively pursued.
Mr Ottey did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Quill struck out the claim. The decision records no substantive findings on the underlying allegations and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records only that the claim was struck out for failure to comply with the tribunal's order dated 31 July 2024 and because it had not been actively pursued; it does not determine the merits of the underlying race discrimination allegation. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only that the claim was struck out for failure to comply with the tribunal's order dated 31 July 2024 and because it had not been actively pursued; it does not determine the merits of the underlying wages claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.