Case 3310902/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v 247 Excellent Quality Care Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3310902/2022
- Decision date
- 30 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal declared that Mrs Gough's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It ordered the Respondent to pay £5,670.29 for the deductions and a further £2,193.28 under section 24(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for financial losses attributable to those deductions.
The Tribunal found that the Respondent failed to pay Mrs Gough's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £509.47. It also found that the Respondent dismissed her in breach of contract by not giving one month's notice or payment in lieu, and awarded £2,434.20 as damages for breach of contract.
Mrs Gough's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because she had been employed for less than two continuous years at the effective date of termination. The total sum awarded to Mrs Gough was £10,807.24.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award comprises £5,670.29 for unauthorised deductions from wages and a further £2,193.28 under section 24(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for financial losses attributable to the deductions. | Upheld | — | £7,864 |
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal found that Mrs Gough's holiday entitlement had not been paid. | Upheld | — | £509 |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal found that Mrs Gough was dismissed in breach of contract by not being given one month's notice or payment in lieu. | Upheld | — | £2,434 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because Mrs Gough had less than two years' continuous employment at the effective date of termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,807
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 24(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.