Case 3310913/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Jennifer Haynes v London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310913/2023
- Decision date
- 27 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Yardley Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Jennifer Haynes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in public before Employment Judge Yardley at Watford on 10 September 2024. The claimant was Mrs Jennifer Haynes and the respondent was London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
The only issue decided in the record was limitation. The tribunal held that the claim for constructive unfair dismissal was presented outside the applicable time limit, but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it within time. It further found that the claim was presented within a further reasonable period.
On that basis, the tribunal ruled that the claim would proceed. The record contains no final liability finding on the merits and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found that the claim for constructive unfair dismissal was not presented within the applicable time limit, but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time and it was brought within a further reasonable period. The claim was therefore allowed to proceed; no merits decision or remedy was recorded in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.