Case 3310918/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Bradford v North Norfolk Limited t/a Dormy House Hotel — 2023
- Case reference
- 3310918/2022
- Decision date
- 7 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Bradford
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 23 August 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge decided the claim could properly be determined under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. The judgment records a monetary award of £1,300.00 in the claimant’s favour. No separate breakdown of the award is given in the judgment.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 7 January 2023 and entered in the register on the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Determined on the papers under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,300.00. | Upheld | — | £1,300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,300
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.