Case 3310927/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Gray v Dixon Food Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3310927/2020
- Decision date
- 21 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hanning
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Gray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP at Watford on 21 May 2021 before Employment Judge Hanning sitting alone. The claimant, Mr S Gray, appeared in person and the respondent, Dixon Food Limited, was represented by Mr M Dixon, the company director. The tribunal recorded that the remote hearing was not objected to and that all issues could be determined remotely.
The tribunal held that three unlawful deduction from wages claims were well founded under section 13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The first was a claim that the respondent failed to pay the claimant the national minimum wage, which the judgment linked to the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 and the National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015. The second was a claim for accrued but untaken annual leave, and the third was a claim for due salary.
For each claim, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a gross sum: £1,919.81 for the national minimum wage shortfall, £288.87 for accrued but untaken annual leave, and £166.67 for due salary. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under section 13(1) ERA 1996 for failure to pay the national minimum wage under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 and the National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015. | Upheld | — | £1,920 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under section 13(1) ERA 1996 for failure to pay accrued but untaken annual leave. | Upheld | — | £289 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under section 13(1) ERA 1996 for failure to pay due salary. | Upheld | — | £167 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,375
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- National Minimum Wage Act 1998
- National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.