Case 3310930/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Awouda Essimi v AGS Ltd t/a AGS 360 Solutions — 2021
- Case reference
- 3310930/2020
- Decision date
- 21 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hanning
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Awouda Essimi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely at Watford on 20 and 21 July 2021 before Employment Judge Hanning sitting alone. The claimant, Miss A Awouda Essimi, was represented by her sister and in person; the respondent was represented by Mr T Fuller of Citation Ltd.
The tribunal found that the claim for unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it. The written record does not set out detailed reasons because reasons had been given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not requested within the stated time limit.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages. It ordered AGS Ltd t/a AGS 360 Solutions to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,652.09. No separate remedy breakdown is given in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,652.09; no separate breakdown was given. | Upheld | — | £2,652 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,652
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.